Minimally invasive direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis with a pedicle screw and hook construct

44Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Object: Lumbar spondylolysis occurs in approximately 6% of the population and presents with localized mechanical back pain, often in young athletes. Surgical treatment may involve decompression, lumbar intersegmental fusion, or direct repair of pars defects. Although such open procedures may effectively resolve symptoms, minimal-access approaches may additionally decrease collateral damage to soft tissues, allowing young, active patients to resume athletic activities sooner. In this study, the authors review their experience repairing bilateral lumbar spondylolyses with screw and hook constructs placed via a minimal-access approach. Methods: Five consecutive pediatric patients with bilateral L-5 spondylolysis were treated. Bilateral incisions (2.5 cm) were made over L-5. Exposure was maintained with bilateral expandable tubular retractor systems. Pedicle screws were placed in the L-5 pedicles and attached to hooks under the L-5 laminae. A direct repair was performed at the pars defect. Clinical characteristics, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Results: All 5 patients underwent surgery; 4 were male (80%) and 1 was female (20%), and the mean age was 15.8 years (range 15-17 years). The mean estimated blood loss and duration of surgery were 37 ml (range 15-75 ml) and 1.94 hours (range 1-3 hours), respectively. Postoperative hospital stays ranged from 1 to 3 days (mean 1.8 days). The only complication occurred in 1 patient who experienced minor superficial wound breakdown. All patients have experienced resolution of symptoms at this preliminary stage, which has continued over an 8-month follow-up period. Conclusions: Lumbar spondylolysis can be adequately and safely treated via minimal-access surgical repair of the pars interarticularis by using pedicle screws and rod-hook constructs. This approach may decrease the collateral soft tissue damage common to open dissections, and may be ideal for young, active surgical candidates.

References Powered by Scopus

The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis

767Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: Part 2: Histologic and histochemical analyses in humans

233Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: The minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach

166Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A systematic review with meta-analysis of posterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in lumbar spondylolisthesis

76Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Management of spondylolysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis in fine athletes. A comprehensive review

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comparison of the techniques of direct pars interarticularis repairs for spondylolysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis: A meta-analysis

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Noggle, J. C., Sciubba, D. M., Samdani, A. F., Anderson, D. G., Betz, R. R., & Asghar, J. (2008). Minimally invasive direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis with a pedicle screw and hook construct. Neurosurgical Focus, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.3171/FOC/2008/25/8/E15

Readers over time

‘08‘09‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

56%

Researcher 7

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 22

81%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

11%

Neuroscience 1

4%

Social Sciences 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0