Global consequences of the bioenergy greenhouse gas accounting error

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Like the global financial crisis, which resulted in part from misguided accounting of mortgages, global policies to expand transportation biofuels and bioelectricity reflect an accounting error. Although the carbon accounting in these policies assumes that plant growth offsets all carbon released by burning biofuels, only additional plant growth can provide an offset. Because they double count biomass and land already used by people or sequestering carbon, many policy proposals aim for bioenergy to supply 20% or more of the world's energy by 2050. That would require almost doubling the present global harvest of plants for all uses, which would likely lead to extensive deforestation and increase greenhouse gases. Fixing the accounting would focus policies on the more limited potential for truly low carbon biofuels.

References Powered by Scopus

A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests

5855Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change

3757Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt

3105Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Economic and ecological views on climate change mitigation with bioenergy and negative emissions

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Integrating place-specific livelihood and equity outcomes into global assessments of bioenergy deployment

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Searchinger, T. (2011). Global consequences of the bioenergy greenhouse gas accounting error. In Energy, Transport, & the Environment: Addressing the Sustainable Mobility Paradigm (Vol. 9781447127178, pp. 679–711). Springer-Verlag London Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2717-8_36

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Researcher 2

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 3

50%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

17%

Energy 1

17%

Engineering 1

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free