Dams: Effects of Hydrological Infrastructure on Development

15Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Hydrological investments, particularly irrigation dams, have multiple potential benefits for economic development. Dams also have financial, environmental, and distributional impacts that can affect their benefits and costs. This article reviews the evidence on the impact of dams on economic development, focusing on the levels and variability of agricultural productivity, and its effect on poverty, health, electricity generation, and flood control. We also review the evidence on irrigation efficiency and collective action of dam maintenance. Throughout the discussion, we highlight the empirical challenges that restrict the body of causally interpretable impact estimates and areas in which the evidence is particularly thin. We conclude with a discussion of emerging issues pertaining to the long-term sustainability of dams impacts and suggest directions for future research.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Solutions for a cultivated planet

6043Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators?

1865Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessing the impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000

1542Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Factor Market Failures and the Adoption of Irrigation in Rwanda

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Irrigation and the spatial pattern of local economic development in India

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Agricultural innovations to reduce the health impacts of dams

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dillon, A., & Fishman, R. (2019, October 5). Dams: Effects of Hydrological Infrastructure on Development. Annual Review of Resource Economics. Annual Reviews Inc. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-093913

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

60%

Researcher 6

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9

41%

Engineering 6

27%

Environmental Science 5

23%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 2

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0