Including non-English language articles in systematic reviews: A reflection on processes for identifying low-cost sources of translation support

16Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Non-English language (NEL) articles are commonly excluded from published systematic reviews. The high cost associated with professional translation services and associated time commitment are often cited as barriers. Whilst there is debate as to the impact of excluding such articles from systematic reviews, doing so can introduce various biases. In order to encourage researchers to consider including these articles in future reviews, this paper aims to reflect on the experience and process of conducting a systematic review which included NEL articles. It provides an overview of the different approaches used to identify sources of low-cost translation support and considers the relative merits of, among others, seeking support through universities, social media, word-of-mouth, and use of personal contacts.

References Powered by Scopus

Dissemination and publication of research findings: An updated review of related biases

771Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Searching for and selecting studies

647Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Guide to Writing a Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol to Enhance Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Health Care

305Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Physical literacy assessment in adults: A systematic review

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Determinants of physical activity in community-dwelling older adults: an umbrella review

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Digital Leisure Engagement and Positive Outcomes in the Workplace: A Systematic Literature Review

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rockliffe, L. (2022). Including non-English language articles in systematic reviews: A reflection on processes for identifying low-cost sources of translation support. Research Synthesis Methods, 13(1), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1508

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

65%

Researcher 5

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

44%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

17%

Psychology 3

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free