An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development

541Citations
Citations of this article
488Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article proposes an integrated theory of acquisition of knowledge about whole numbers and fractions. Although whole numbers and fractions differ in many ways that influence their development, an important commonality is the centrality of knowledge of numerical magnitudes in overall understanding. The present findings with 11- and 13-year-olds indicate that, as with whole numbers, accuracy of fraction magnitude representations is closely related to both fractions arithmetic proficiency and overall mathematics achievement test scores, that fraction magnitude representations account for substantial variance in mathematics achievement test scores beyond that explained by fraction arithmetic proficiency, and that developing effective strategies plays a key role in improved knowledge of fractions. Theoretical and instructional implications are discussed. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

Verbal reports as data

2995Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Mental Representation of Parity and Number Magnitude

2144Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Core systems of number

1929Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Early Predictors of High School Mathematics Achievement

564Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement

391Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From "sense of number" to "sense of magnitude": The role of continuous magnitudes in numerical cognition

349Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Siegler, R. S., Thompson, C. A., & Schneider, M. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology, 62(4), 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.03.001

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 234

69%

Researcher 47

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 36

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 23

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 160

50%

Social Sciences 105

33%

Mathematics 45

14%

Arts and Humanities 10

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 35
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 9

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0