Understanding the Brandenburger-Keisler paradox

9Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Adam Brandenburger and H. Jerome Keisler have recently discovered a two person Russell-style paradox. They show that the following configurations of beliefs is impossible: Ann believes that Bob assumes that Ann believes that Bob's assumption is wrong. In [7] a modal logic interpretation of this paradox is proposed. The idea is to introduce two modal operators intended to represent the agents' beliefs and assumptions. The goal of this paper is to take this analysis further and study this paradox from the point of view of a modal logician. In particular, we show that the paradox can be seen as a theorem of an appropriate hybrid logic. © 2007 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

References Powered by Scopus

Universal grammar

673Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interactive epistemology I: Knowledge

246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hybrid languages

116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Toward predicate approaches to modality

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From Lawvere to Brandenburger-Keisler: Interactive forms of diagonalization and self-reference

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A non-self-referential paradox in epistemic game theory

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pacuit, E. (2007). Understanding the Brandenburger-Keisler paradox. Studia Logica, 86(3), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-007-9069-2

Readers over time

‘11‘14‘15‘16‘17‘1900.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Philosophy 5

63%

Mathematics 1

13%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

13%

Psychology 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0