Collaborative Planning for Radical Innovation: Lessons from a Health Care Region in Denmark

2Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, we explain the challenges that emerged when a Danish region tried to employ innovation planning structures, without taking into account already existing governance paradigms in the organisation. We present a qualitative case study of a large regional health organisation in Denmark, which in 2016–2017 had the aim of fostering collaborative innovation. Drawing upon the concept of governance paradigms, we analyse how the strategic initiative and planning process, which used collaborative design thinking methods, in line with the New Public Governance paradigm, was hampered and finally rejected by managers embedded in an organisational context dominated primarily by the New Public Management and Traditional Public Administration paradigms.

References Powered by Scopus

A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS?

6072Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework<sup>1</sup>

1512Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management

883Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Value Propositions in Public Collaborations: Regaining Organizational Focus Through Value Configurations

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bureaucracies’ Extended Arm in Co-creation: A Study of Institutional Complexity in the Context of Public Services

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hansen, K. B., & Waldorff, S. B. (2020). Collaborative Planning for Radical Innovation: Lessons from a Health Care Region in Denmark. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 24(4), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.v24i4.7945

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

30%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

20%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 5

42%

Social Sciences 5

42%

Computer Science 1

8%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free