Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Polyethylene Glycol Loxenatide for Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China

10Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide versus polyethylene glycol loxenatide (PEG-loxenatide) in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on metformin, from a Chinese healthcare systems perspective. Methods: The study applied the Swedish Institute of Health Economics Diabetes Cohort Model to evaluate the long-term clinical and economic outcomes of once-weekly treatment of semaglutide at 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg, respectively, versus PEG-loxenatide 0.2 mg, over a 40-year time horizon. Baseline cohort characteristics were collected from the SUSTAIN China trial. A network meta-analysis was conducted to obtain comparative treatment effects of once-weekly semaglutide and PEG-loxenatide based on two phase 3a clinical trials. Drug costs were sourced from the national bidding price of China. Outcomes were discounted at 5.0% per annum. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to assess the uncertainty of the base-case results. Results: When compared with PEG-loxenatide 0.2 mg, the projections of outcomes over the 40-year time horizon in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on metformin showed that treatment with once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg were associated with improved discounted life expectancy by 0.08 and 0.12 years, and improved discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy by 0.16 and 0.22 quality-adjusted life-years, respectively. Once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg were achieved at lifetime cost savings of 19,309 China Yuan (CNY) and 10,179 CNY, respectively. Sensitivity analyses verified the robustness of the results. Conclusion: From the perspective of Chinese healthcare systems, treatment with once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide represents a dominant option versus PEG-loxenatide for patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on metformin.

References Powered by Scopus

Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)

18932Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes

6508Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes

5485Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor: mechanisms and advances in therapy

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GLP-1R Signaling and Functional Molecules in Incretin Therapy

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Research Advances in Fusion Protein-Based Drugs for Diabetes Treatment

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, L., Ruan, Z., Ung, C. O. L., Zhang, Y., Shen, Y., Han, S., … Guo, L. (2023). Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Polyethylene Glycol Loxenatide for Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China. Diabetes Therapy, 14(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01336-7

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 2

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

33%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

33%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

17%

Psychology 1

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free