Ultrasound screening for birth defects: A medico-economic review

4Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives The systematic use of ultrasound during pregnancy aims at birth defect detection. Our objective was to assess the economic efficiency of prenatal ultrasound screening for fetal malformations. Methods We carried out a literature review on Medline via PubMed between 1985 and 2015, from the economic perspective of the prenatal ultrasound screening for fetal malformations. Results The literature on this subject was sparse and we selected only twelve articles presenting relevant economic data, of which only eight were proper medico-economic studies. We found arguments for the economic effectiveness of ultrasound screening for fetal malformation detection, which is largely linked to the terminations of pregnancies and to the cost of the handicaps “avoided”. However, none of the reviewed articles could reach medico-economic conclusions. Additionally, we highlighted various elements making economic analyses more complex in this field: the choice of the method, the uncertainty around two essential parameters (the efficiency of ultrasound and the costs of procedures) and the difficulties to compare or to generalize results. We also noticed important methodological heterogeneity among the studies and the absence of French study. Conclusions Previously published data are insufficient to assess the economic efficiency of prenatal ultrasound screening for fetal malformations.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferrier, C., Dhombres, F., Guilbaud, L., Durand-Zaleski, I., & Jouannic, J. M. (2017). Ultrasound screening for birth defects: A medico-economic review. Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite et Senologie, 45(7–8), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2017.06.007

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

86%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

56%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

22%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

11%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free