Interventions in primary care to reduce medication related adverse events and hospital admissions: Systematic review and meta-analysis

172Citations
Citations of this article
346Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To identify and evaluate studies of interventions in primary care aimed at reducing medication related adverse events that result in morbidity, hospital admission, and/or mortality. Methods: Fourteen electronic databases were systematically searched for published and unpublished data. Bibliographies of retrieved papers were searched and experts and first authors contacted in an attempt to locate additional studies. There were no restrictions on language of publication. All interventions applied in primary care settings which aimed to improve patient safety by reducing adverse events resulting from medication overuse or misuse were considered. Randomised controlled trials, controlled trials, controlled before and after studies, and interrupted time series studies were eligible for inclusion. Study quality assessment and data extraction were undertaken using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care data collection checklist and template. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. Results: 159 studies were initially identified, of which 38 satisfied our inclusion criteria. These were categorised as follows: 17 pharmacist-led interventions (of which 15 reported hospital admissions as an outcome); eight interventions led by other primary healthcare professionals that reported preventable drug related morbidity as an outcome; and 13 complex interventions that included a component of medication review aimed at reducing falls in the elderly (the outcome being falls). Meta-analysis found that pharmacist-led interventions are effective at reducing hospital admissions (OR 0.64 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.96)), but restricting analysis to the randomised controlled trials failed to demonstrate significant benefit (OR 0.92 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.05)). Pooling the results of studies in the other categories did not demonstrate any significant effect. Conclusions: There is relatively weak evidence to indicate that pharmacist-led medication reviews are effective in reducing hospital admissions. There is currently no evidence for the effectiveness of other interventions which aim at reducing admissions or preventable drug related morbidity. More randomised controlled trials of primary care based pharmacist-led interventions are needed to decide whether or not this intervention is effective in reducing hospital admissions.

References Powered by Scopus

Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement

4067Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community

1804Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improving safety with information technology

1143Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Hospital admissions associated with adverse drug reactions: A systematic review of prospective observational studies

492Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): A multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-eff ectiveness analysis

319Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Does pharmacist-led medication review help to reduce hospital admissions and deaths in older people? A systematic review and meta-analysis

302Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Royal, S., Smeaton, L., Avery, A. J., Hurwitz, B., & Sheikh, A. (2006, February). Interventions in primary care to reduce medication related adverse events and hospital admissions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Quality and Safety in Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.012153

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 160

66%

Researcher 46

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 20

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 15

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 123

54%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 52

23%

Nursing and Health Professions 36

16%

Social Sciences 18

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free