Digesting all the options: Laboratory testing for celiac disease

7Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Celiac disease is a complex immune-mediated disorder that is triggered by ingestion of gluten and related proteins in genetically susceptible individuals. Under conditions of increased intestinal permeability, gluten-derived peptides can travel across the intestinal epithelium and undergo deamidation catalyzed by the tissue transglutaminase (TTG) enzyme. This renders them immunogenic in individuals expressing specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DQ heterodimers. The resulting immune response is characterized by the production of antibodies against both deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP) and TTG, generation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and activation of cytotoxic T cells. This response damages the intestinal epithelium resulting in the wide range of gastrointestinal and systemic symptoms observed in those with celiac disease. Celiac disease diagnosis has traditionally been based on biopsy and histological examination of the small intestine. While this approach is still considered the gold standard, it is invasive and susceptible to both false-positive and false-negative results. Several laboratory tests have become available to aid in the diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease, and are the focus of this review. These include serological tests for celiac disease-specific antibodies such as anti-endomysial antibodies, anti-TTG antibodies and anti-DGP antibodies of both the immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) class, genetic tests to elucidate HLA DQ status and ancillary tests such as total IgA. While some have suggested that laboratory tests may replace intestinal biopsy in specific circumstances, others maintain that this procedure remains a critical component of celiac disease diagnosis. We review the analytical methodology, strengths, weaknesses, diagnostic performance and clinical utility of the various laboratory tests for celiac disease. Potential future markers and tests that are now considered obsolete are also discussed. Current clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of celiac disease from the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, the American College of Gastroenterology and the World Gastroenterology Organisation are summarized, and important differences between these guidelines are highlighted.

References Powered by Scopus

European society for pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease

2279Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine. A molecular and immunobiologic approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity ('celiac sprue')

2053Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Identification of tissue transglutaminase as the autoantigen of celiac disease

1888Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Assessment of European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) guidelines in an Australian paediatric population

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Are viruses and parasites linked to celiac disease? A question that still has no definite answer

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Treating coeliac disease. How do we measure adherence to the gluten-free diet?

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barakauskas, V. E., Lam, G. Y., & Estey, M. P. (2014, December 1). Digesting all the options: Laboratory testing for celiac disease. Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences. Informa Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408363.2014.958813

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2405101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

58%

Researcher 5

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

43%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

30%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

17%

Social Sciences 2

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0