Continuous intra-arterial blood gas monitoring in rats

12Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Studies on lung injury and its treatment options are often performed on small animals like rats. Because conventional blood gas analyses may not detect rapid changes in gas exchange during respiratory distress syndrome and intermittent blood withdrawal can result in hypovolaemia and anaemia, we tested the applicability and accuracy of a continuous intra-vascular blood gas monitor (Paratrend 7+). Anaesthetized and ventilated rats with a body weight of 398 ± 45 g (n = 22) had a 20-gauge cannula inserted in both carotid arteries. A photochemical blood gas sensor for continuous measurement (Paratrend 7+) was advanced into the aorta via the left carotid artery. Blood was sampled for intermittent blood gas analysis by means of the right carotid artery. Arterial pO2 was varied by applying different inspiratory oxygen concentrations, and arterial pCO2 by applying different respiratory rates. Paired blood gas measurements (n = 136) were analysed over a wide range of pO2 values (5.3-76.8 kPa). We found an acceptable correlation for pO2 (r2 = 0.98), pCO2 (r2 = 0.96) and pH (r2 = 0.92). The calculated bias and imprecision for pO 2 was -1.0 ± 3.3 kPa, for pCO2 0.04 ± 0.28 kPa and for hydrogen ion concentration -0.05 ± 2.2 nmol/l. We conclude that in rats, continuous blood gas monitoring with a photochemical blood gas sensor provides pO2, pCO2 and pH measurements with acceptable accuracy.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Get full text
39Citations
28Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pakulla, M. A., Obal, D., & Loer, S. A. (2004). Continuous intra-arterial blood gas monitoring in rats. Laboratory Animals, 38(2), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367704322968803

Readers over time

‘11‘13‘14‘16‘17‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

53%

Researcher 6

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

63%

Chemistry 2

13%

Engineering 2

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0