Investigation of probabilistic optimization for tomotherapy

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This work builds on a suite of studies related to the 'interplay', or lack thereof, for respiratory motion with helical tomotherapy (HT). It helps explain why HT treatments without active motion management had clinical outcomes that matched positive expectations. An analytical calculation is performed to illuminate the frequency range for which interplay-type dose errors could occur. Then, an experiment is performed which completes a suite of tests. The experiment shows the potential for a stable motion probability distribution function (PDF) with HT and respiratory motion. This PDF enables one to use a motion-robust or probabilistic optimization to intrinsically include respiratory motion into the treatment planning. The reason why HT is robust to respiratory motion is related to the beam modulation sampling of the tumor motion. Because active tracking-based motion management is more complicated for a variety of reasons, HT optimization that is robust to motion is a useful alternative for those many patients that cannot benefit from active motion management.

References Powered by Scopus

The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76

1948Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tomotherapy: A new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy

914Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of intra-fraction motion on IMRT dose delivery: Statistical analysis and simulation

451Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kissick, M. W., Mackie, T. R., Flynn, R. T., Mo, X., Campos, D. D., Yan, Y., & Zhao, D. (2012). Investigation of probabilistic optimization for tomotherapy. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 13(5), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3865

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

50%

Researcher 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 4

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free