Multi-model, multi-sensor estimates of global evapotranspiration: climatology, uncertainties and trends

156Citations
Citations of this article
145Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Estimating evapotranspiration (ET) at continental to global scales is central to understanding the partitioning of energy and water at the earth's surface and the feedbacks with the atmosphere and biosphere, especially in the context of climate change. Recent evaluations of global estimates from remote sensing, upscaled observations, land surface models and atmospheric reanalyses indicate large uncertainty across the datasets of the order of 50% of the global annual mean value. In this paper, we explore the uncertainties in global land ET estimates using three process-based ET models and a set of remote sensing and observational based radiation and meteorological forcing datasets. Input forcings were obtained from International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) and Surface Radiation Budget (SRB). The three process-based ET models are: a surface energy balance method (SEBS), a revised Penman-Monteith (PM) model, and a modified Priestley-Taylor model. Evaluations of the radiation products from ISCCP and SRB show large differences in the components of surface radiation, and temporal inconsistencies that relate to changes in satellite sensors and retrieval algorithms. In particular, step changes in the ISCCP surface temperature and humidity data lead to spurious increases in downward and upward longwave radiation that contributes to a step change in net radiation, and the ISCCP data are not used further. An ensemble of global estimates of land surface ET are generated at daily time scale and 0.5 degree spatial resolution for 1984-2007 using two SRB radiation products (SRB and SRBqc) and the three models. Uncertainty in ET from the models is much larger than the uncertainty from the radiation data. The largest uncertainties relative to the mean annual ET are in transition zones between dry and humid regions and monsoon regions. Comparisons with previous studies and an inferred estimate of ET from long-term inferred ET indicate that the ensemble mean value is reasonable, but generally biased high globally. Long-term changes over 1984-2007 indicate a slight increase over 1984-1998 and decline thereafter, although uncertainties in the forcing radiation data and lack of direct linkage with soil moisture limitations in the models prevents attribution of these changes. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

The version-2 global precipitation climatology project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979-present)

4657Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities

3162Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: Review and synthesis

1868Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Oceanic and terrestrial sources of continental precipitation

424Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A drought monitoring and forecasting system for sub-sahara african water resources and food security

373Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Terrestrial and Inland water systems

367Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vinukollu, R. K., Meynadier, R., Sheffield, J., & Wood, E. F. (2011). Multi-model, multi-sensor estimates of global evapotranspiration: climatology, uncertainties and trends. Hydrological Processes, 25(26), 3993–4010. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8393

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 70

65%

Researcher 28

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 45

45%

Environmental Science 31

31%

Engineering 15

15%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0