Developing students’ creative thinking using innovative education technologies

2Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The development of creative thinking is an important task of modern education. The purpose of this study is to empirically confirm/disprove the hypothesis that the tools of an educational environment with innovative technologies contribute to the development of pedagogy students’ creativity. For this purpose, a creativity course was designed and implemented. Before and after the course, students were assessed using the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking. Similarities or differences between the control and experimental groups were tested using the χ2 criterion. After taking a course to develop creative thinking, the situation in both groups changed significantly. The research is of theoretical and practical value for teachers and pedagogy students interested in creative thinking development and/or implementation of digital technologies in the educational process. It also has value for software developers. The effectiveness of implementing technological innovations in the educational process depends on these specialists.

References Powered by Scopus

Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT)

501Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predictive Validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking

379Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

E-learning, M-learning and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis

355Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, A., & Burdina, G. (2023). Developing students’ creative thinking using innovative education technologies. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2184390

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

58%

Lecturer / Post doc 9

38%

Researcher 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 7

39%

Psychology 5

28%

Computer Science 3

17%

Mathematics 3

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free