Three Reflections on Banking Regulations and Cross-Border Financial Flows

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Edwin Truman discusses the incidence of banking crises and concludes that there is no reason to expect an end to financial crises in the future. Moreover, he argues that financial reforms in recent years may have had the effect of increasing the severity of those crises that will occur by preventing the occurrence of smaller crises. Second, he finds that capital controls can be of use but not as a rule for all countries in all circumstances. Although a sudden stop of capital flows often precede crises they are not the underlying cause. Instead, there is greed on the part of borrowers and lenders that turns into fear when a disturbance occurs. Thus capital flow management controls, although often desirable, are not a panacea. Moreover, the authorities may find it difficult to distinguish between good and bad types of banking flows and over time capital controls will be evaded and become distortionary. Finally, Truman explores the possibility of major countries taking into account the effect of their policies on others but is not hopeful that central banks can deviate much from the local mandates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Truman, E. M. (2019). Three Reflections on Banking Regulations and Cross-Border Financial Flows. In The 2008 Global Financial Crisis in Retrospect: Causes of the Crisis and National Regulatory Responses (pp. 157–153). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12395-6_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free