Deviation from target capital structure as a factor of acquisition decisions in european developed markets

0Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the causal relation between deviations from target capital structure (leverage deficit) and acquisition choices in capital markets in Western Europe. The analysis is conducted using a sample of 921 large companies, which represents a strong and solid base for testing target capital structure and takeover interdependence, as the focus is on the period when half of the largest M&A deals in Western Europe occurred. This study found that leverage deficit is a crucial determinant of acquisition choices and market reaction on acquisition announcements, measured by CARs to bidders. Companies that are underleveraged relative to their target capital structure have a higher probability of undertaking acquisitions. On the other hand, the market reacts unfavourably to acquisition announcements of underleveraged acquirers – overleveraged companies undertake the most value-enhancing acquisitions, whilst underleveraged companies make poor acquisition choices. This paper enriches the literature by empirically extending the understanding of how managers make investment decisions in relation to capital structure, and how capital markets assess the impact of these investments.

References Powered by Scopus

The Capital Structure Puzzle

3649Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What Do We Know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data

3403Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice

2852Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mugoša, A., & Popović, S. (2021). Deviation from target capital structure as a factor of acquisition decisions in european developed markets. Argumenta Oeconomica, 46(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.15611/aoe.2021.1.03

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 12

67%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5

28%

Engineering 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free