Exploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated for autism: in response to Jonathan Levitt

85Citations
Citations of this article
330Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Levitt argues that the social model of disability needs to be re-invigorated, potentially by adapting the tool for separate countries. The social model has been successfully applied for some disabled groups in the United Kingdom. However, the social model is not implemented for neurodivergent labels such as autism, through the negative language of autism, causing severe problems for autistic individuals’ daily lives. The social model can be re-invigorated for autism, removing social barriers by changing non-autistic people’s attitudes towards autism through ensuring positive language of autism, preventing the categorisation of autism and fully enacting The Autism Act 2009 and The Equality Act 2010.

References Powered by Scopus

Exploring internalized ableism using critical race theory

298Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Approaching disability: Critical issues and perspectives

85Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact of early school-based screening and intervention programs for ADHD on children's outcomes and access to services: Follow-up of a school-based trial at age 10 years

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Avoiding Ableist Language: Suggestions for Autism Researchers

680Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Conceptual Analysis of Autistic Masking: Understanding the Narrative of Stigma and the Illusion of Choice

226Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Agency of autistic children in technology research - A critical literature review

151Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Woods, R. (2017). Exploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated for autism: in response to Jonathan Levitt. Disability and Society, 32(7), 1090–1095. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1328157

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 119

78%

Researcher 14

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 9

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 71

48%

Psychology 47

32%

Arts and Humanities 16

11%

Nursing and Health Professions 14

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 34

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free