Reconstructing nonlinear dynamic models of gene regulation using stochastic sampling

39Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The reconstruction of gene regulatory networks from time series gene expression data is one of the most difficult problems in systems biology. This is due to several reasons, among them the combinatorial explosion of possible network topologies, limited information content of the experimental data with high levels of noise, and the complexity of gene regulation at the transcriptional, translational and post-translational levels. At the same time, quantitative, dynamic models, ideally with probability distributions over model topologies and parameters, are highly desirable.Results: We present a novel approach to infer such models from data, based on nonlinear differential equations, which we embed into a stochastic Bayesian framework. We thus address both the stochasticity of experimental data and the need for quantitative dynamic models. Furthermore, the Bayesian framework allows it to easily integrate prior knowledge into the inference process. Using stochastic sampling from the Bayes' posterior distribution, our approach can infer different likely network topologies and model parameters along with their respective probabilities from given data. We evaluate our approach on simulated data and the challenge #3 data from the DREAM 2 initiative. On the simulated data, we study effects of different levels of noise and dataset sizes. Results on real data show that the dynamics and main regulatory interactions are correctly reconstructed.Conclusions: Our approach combines dynamic modeling using differential equations with a stochastic learning framework, thus bridging the gap between biophysical modeling and stochastic inference approaches. Results show that the method can reap the advantages of both worlds, and allows the reconstruction of biophysically accurate dynamic models from noisy data. In addition, the stochastic learning framework used permits the computation of probability distributions over models and model parameters, which holds interesting prospects for experimental design purposes. © 2009 Mazur et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Figures

  • Figure 1 Regulation functions. Hill functions fij for different Hill coefficients m = 1, 3, 5. The left plot shows an activation, the right plot an inhibitory effect. The threshold θj was chosen equal to 3 for both plots, at this concentration of the regulating gene j, half the maximum effect on gene i is achieved.
  • Figure 2 Lq Prior. Plot of the two-dimensional Lq prior p(b1, b2):= Lq(b1; q, s)·Lq(b2; q, s) for q = 0.5 and s = 1. It can clearly be seen how this prior favors points (b1, b2) where one of the two components is approximately zero over points at the same distance from the origin with both b1, b2 ≠ 0.
  • Table 1: Iterative Markov chain Monte Carlo Algorithm
  • Table 2: Classification Matrix for ROC/PR Evaluation
  • Figure 3 Gold Standard Topology and Simulated Data. (a) True network of the DREAM 2 challenge #3 five gene time series data, showing the bio-engineered interactions between the five genes artificially inserted into yeast. (b) Time course of simulation with model in arbitrary time and concentration units, for the simulated five gene model. Different numbers of equidistant time points from this data were used for network reconstruction in the simulation study. The time courses of gene 2 and gene 3 are almost the same.
  • Table 3: Inferred Interaction Strength Parameters for Simulated Data for Dataset with 40 Time Points
  • Figure 4 AUC Values for Simulated Data. AUC values for different noise levels and different numbers of time points used for network reconstruction. The standard deviation of the noise was varied from s = 0 to s = 0.3, the number of time points from T = 10 to T = 200. The plots show (a) AUC values under the ROC curve and (b) AUC values for PR curves for varying T and s. The blue surface indicates the AUCROC and AUCPR values that would follow for random guessing.
  • Table 4: Inferred Interaction Strength Parameters for DREAM 2 Challenge #3 Data

References Powered by Scopus

Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines

30222Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Monte carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications

10869Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins

3272Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

DREAM4: Combining genetic and dynamic information to identify biological networks and Dynamical Models

200Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Review on statistical methods for gene network reconstruction using expression data

149Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Perturbation Biology: Inferring Signaling Networks in Cellular Systems

108Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mazur, J., Ritter, D., Reinelt, G., & Kaderali, L. (2009). Reconstructing nonlinear dynamic models of gene regulation using stochastic sampling. BMC Bioinformatics, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-448

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

43%

Researcher 16

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 14

26%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26

53%

Computer Science 12

24%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 8

16%

Engineering 3

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0