New Maize Variety Adoption in Mozambique: A Spatial Approach

5Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Farmers in developing countries can dramatically improve their productivity by adopting new plant varieties. Yet, informational barriers often mean adoption rates remain low. In this study, we focus on how learning from others represents one means of removing informational barriers. We capture the effect of social learning through an explicitly spatial econometric model applied to farm-level maize adoption rates in Mozambique. We find that social learning is significant and can help explain the apparent clustering of adoption among farmers. Agencies interested in promoting variety adoption, therefore, would be well served to leverage the strength of existing information networks, rather than imposing solutions that work against interfarmer information flow.

References Powered by Scopus

A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification

41030Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades

3809Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A simple model of heed behavior

3546Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Learning from neighboring farmers: Does spatial dependence affect adoption of drought-tolerant wheat varieties in China?

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Promoting the adoption of climate-smart agricultural technologies among maize farmers in Ghana: using digital advisory services

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding the Adoption of Modern Cultivars in India: Adoption Probability and Use Intensity

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fang, D., & Richards, T. J. (2018). New Maize Variety Adoption in Mozambique: A Spatial Approach. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12166

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

37%

Researcher 5

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

16%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9

45%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

35%

Social Sciences 3

15%

Engineering 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free