Bridging systems medicine and patient needs

29Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While there is widespread consensus on the need both to change the prevailing research and development (R&D) paradigm and provide the community with an efficient way to personalize medicine, ecosystem stakeholders grapple with divergent conceptions about which quantitative approach should be preferred. The primary purpose of this position paper is to contrast these approaches. The second objective is to introduce a framework to bridge simulation outputs and patient outcomes, thus empowering the implementation of systems medicine.

References Powered by Scopus

Systems biology: A brief overview

3290Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network

1702Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A new approach to decoding life: Systems biology

1391Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Systems chronotherapeutics

235Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reconciling evidence-based medicine and precision medicine in the era of big data: Challenges and opportunities

172Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The new holism: P4 systems medicine and the medicalization of health and life itself

123Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boissel, J. P., Auffray, C., Noble, D., Hood, L., & Boissel, F. H. (2015, March 1). Bridging systems medicine and patient needs. CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology. Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.26

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

49%

Researcher 14

34%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

38%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8

28%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 7

24%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0