Lung cancer screening an asbestos exposed population: Existing lung cancer risk criteria are not sufficient

6Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and Objective: Asbestos is a major risk factor for lung cancer, with or without tobacco smoke exposure. Low dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for early lung cancer is effective but only when targeting high risk populations. This study aimed to analyse the effectiveness of LDCT screening in an asbestos exposed population and to compare lung cancer screening program (LCSP) eligibility criteria. Methods: Participants in an asbestos health surveillance program, the Western Australia Asbestos Review Program, underwent at least one LDCT scan and lung function assessment as part of annual review between 2012 and 2017. Lung cancer cases were confirmed through linkage to the WA cancer registry. Theoretical eligibility for different screening programs was calculated. Results: Five thousand seven hundred and two LDCT scans were performed on 1743 individuals. The median age was 69.8 years, 1481 (85.0%) were male and 1147 (65.8%) were ever-smokers (median pack-year exposure of 20.0). Overall, 26 lung cancers were detected (1.5% of the population; 3.5 cases per 1000 person-years of observation). Lung cancer was early stage in 86.4% and four (15.4%) cases were never smokers. Based on current lung screening program criteria, 1299 (74.5%) of this population, including the majority (17, 65.4%) of lung cancer cases, would not have been eligible for any LCSP. Conclusion: This population is at raised risk despite modest tobacco exposure. LDCT screening is effective at identifying early-stage lung cancer in this population and existing lung cancer risk criteria do not capture this population adequately.

References Powered by Scopus

Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries

77856Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening

8932Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The IASLC lung cancer staging project: Proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM Classification for lung cancer

3602Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Occupational lung cancer screening: A Collegium Ramazzini statement

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Smoking, mortality, access to diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer in Brazil

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lung cancer: Removing toxic dust from our environment

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brims, F. J. H., Harris, E. J. A., Murray, C., Kumarasamy, C., Ho, A., Adler, B., … de Klerk, N. H. (2023). Lung cancer screening an asbestos exposed population: Existing lung cancer risk criteria are not sufficient. Respirology, 28(6), 543–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.14487

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

67%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

17%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

8%

Social Sciences 1

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free