Functioning and health in patients with cancer on home-parenteral nutrition: A qualitative study

20Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Malnutrition is a common problem in patients with cancer. One possible strategy to prevent malnutrition and further deterioration is to administer home-parenteral nutrition (HPN). While the effect on survival is still not clear, HPN presumably improves functioning and quality of life. Thus, patients' experiences concerning functioning and quality of life need to be considered when deciding on the provision of HPN. Currently used quality of life measures hardly reflect patients' perspectives and experiences. The objective of our study was to investigate the perspectives of patients with cancer on their experience of functioning and health in relation to HPN in order to get an item pool to develop a comprehensive measure to assess the impact of HPN in this population.Methods: We conducted a series of qualitative semi-structured interviews. The interviews were analysed to identify categories of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) addressed by patients' statements. Patients were consecutively included in the study until an additional patient did not yield any new information.Results: We extracted 94 different ICF-categories from 16 interviews representing patient-relevant aspects of functioning and health (32 categories from the ICF component 'Body Functions', 10 from 'Body Structures', 32 from 'Activities & Participation', 18 from 'Environmental Factors'). About 8% of the concepts derived from the interviews could not be linked to specific ICF categories because they were either too general, disease-specific or pertained to 'Personal Factors'. Patients referred to 22 different aspects of functioning improving due to HPN; mainly activities of daily living, mobility, sleep and emotional functions.Conclusions: The ICF proved to be a satisfactory framework to standardize the response of patients with cancer on HPN. For most aspects reported by the patients, a matching concept and ICF category could be found. The development of categories of the component 'Personal Factors' should be promoted to close the existing gap when analyzing interviews using the ICF. The identification and standardization of concepts derived from individual interviews was the first step towards creating new measures based on patients' preferences and experiences which both catch the most relevant aspects of functioning and are sensitive enough to monitor change associated to an intervention such as HPN in a vulnerable population with cancer. © 2010 Mueller et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Focus on research methods: Whatever happened to qualitative description?

8514Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned

1047Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer Therapy-Induced Oral and Gastrointestinal Mucositis

656Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to understand the health and functioning experiences of people with chronic conditions from the person perspective: A systematic review

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Palliative home parenteral nutrition in patients with ovarian cancer and malignant bowel obstruction: Experiences of women and family caregivers

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Systematic review of ICF core set from 2001 to 2012

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mueller, M., Lohmann, S., Thul, P., Weimann, A., & Grill, E. (2010). Functioning and health in patients with cancer on home-parenteral nutrition: A qualitative study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-41

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

50%

Researcher 14

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 31

60%

Nursing and Health Professions 13

25%

Psychology 6

12%

Social Sciences 2

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 272

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free