Positive selection, relaxation, and acceleration in the evolution of the human and chimp genome

110Citations
Citations of this article
148Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

For years evolutionary biologists have been interested in searching for the genetic bases underlying humanness. Recent efforts at a large or a complete genomic scale have been conducted to search for positively selected genes in human and in chimp. However, recently developed methods allowing for a more sensitive and controlled approach in the detection of positive selection can be employed. Here, using 13,198 genes, we have deduced the sets of genes involved in rate acceleration, positive selection, and relaxation of selective constraints in human, in chimp, and in their ancestral lineage since the divergence from murids. Significant deviations from the strict molecular clock were observed in 469 human and in 651 chimp genes. The more stringent branch-site test of positive selection detected 108 human and 577 chimp positively selected genes. An important proportion of the positively selected genes did not show a significant acceleration in rates, and similarly, many of the accelerated genes did not show significant signals of positive selection. Functional differentiation of genes under rate acceleration, positive selection, and relaxation was not statistically significant between human and chimp with the exception of terms related to G-protein coupled receptors and sensory perception. Both of these were over-represented under relaxation in human in relation to chimp. Comparing differences between derived and ancestral lineages, a more conspicuous change in trends seems to have favored positive selection in the human lineage. Since most of the positively selected genes are different under the same functional categories between these species, we suggest that the individual roles of the alternative positively selected genes may be an important factor underlying biological differences between these species. © 2006 Arbiza et al.

Figures

  • Table 1. RRT Results
  • Table 2. Evolutionary Rates of Human and of Chimp
  • Table 3. Functional Analysis of Genes with Deviations from the Molecular Clock
  • Table 4. Functional Analysis of PSG
  • Figure 1. PS and Rates of Evolution
  • Figure 2. Phylogenetic Distribution of PSG under Tests I and II (A) The differential distribution of genes along tree branches, suggests a different pattern of occurrence of PS (Test II) and RSC (Test I) in derived and ancestral lineages. Numbers in red represent the total number of genes detected in each test after correcting for multiple testing. Numbers in black are common orthologous genes observed between lineages. Numbers in blue are genes observed in both tests. (B) The phylogenetic distribution of four representative GO categories is shown in human, in chimp, and in the ancestral lineage as depicted in the tree defined above. Numbers correspond to the percentage representation of genes under PS and RSC for each term out of the total number of genes with GO annotation. Filled circles show significant (red) and nonsignificant (grey) differences in the comparisons (see text for a detailed explanation). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020038.g002
  • Figure 3. Ancestral and Derived Trends in Adaptation and RSC
  • Table 5. A Small Sample of the Human and the Chimp Genes Deduced under Tests I and II

References Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

32273Citations
12875Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arbiza, L., Dopazo, J., & Dopazo, H. (2006). Positive selection, relaxation, and acceleration in the evolution of the human and chimp genome. PLoS Computational Biology, 2(4), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020038

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2406121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 55

42%

Researcher 40

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 29

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93

75%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 26

21%

Social Sciences 3

2%

Computer Science 2

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0