How a co-actor's task affects monitoring of own errors: Evidence from a social event-related potential study

25Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Efficient flexible behavior requires continuous monitoring of performance for possible deviations from the intended goal of an action. This also holds for joint action. When jointly performing a task, one needs to not only know the other's goals and intentions but also generate behavioral adjustments that are dependent on the other person's task. Previous studies have shown that in joint action people not only represent their own task but also the task of their co-actor. The current study investigated whether these so-called shared representations affect error monitoring as reflected in the response-locked error-related negativity (Ne/ERN) following own errors. Sixteen pairs of participants performed a social go/no-go task, while EEG and behavioral data were obtained. Responses were compatible or incompatible relative to the go/no-go action of the co-actor. Erroneous responses on no-go stimuli were examined. The results demonstrated increased Ne/ERN amplitudes and longer reaction times following errors on compatible compared to incompatible no-go stimuli. Thus, Ne/ERNs were larger after errors on trials that did not require a response from the co-actor either compared to errors on trials that did require a response from the co-actor. As the task of the other person is the only difference between these two types of errors, these findings show that people also represent their co-actor's task during error monitoring in joint action. An extension of existing models on performance monitoring in individual action is put forward to explain the current findings in joint action. Importantly, we propose that inclusion of a co-actor's task in performance monitoring may facilitate adaptive behavior in social interactions enabling fast anticipatory and corrective actions. © 2011 The Author(s).

References Powered by Scopus

Conflict monitoring and cognitive control

5727Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact

4485Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity

3241Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Systematic analysis of video data from different human–robot interaction studies: a categorization of social signals during error situations

77Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Error, rather than its probability, elicits specific electrocortical signatures: A combined EEG-immersive virtual reality study of action observation

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lost in the Rhythm: Effects of Rhythm on Subsequent Interpersonal Coordination

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Bruijn, E. R. A., Miedl, S. F., & Bekkering, H. (2011). How a co-actor’s task affects monitoring of own errors: Evidence from a social event-related potential study. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2615-1

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2405101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 43

60%

Researcher 16

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 13

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 48

72%

Neuroscience 10

15%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

7%

Computer Science 4

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0