Antagonistic epistasis for ecophysiological trait differences between Solanum species

17Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Epistasis, the nonadditive interaction between loci, is thought to play a role in many fundamental evolutionary processes, including adaptive differentiation and speciation. Focusing on species differences in ecophysiological traits, we examined the strength and direction of pairwise epistatic interactions between target chromosomal regions from one species, when co-introgressed into the genetic background of a foreign species. • A full diallel cross was performed using 15 near-isogenic lines (NILs) constructed between two tomato species (Solanum habrochaites and Solanum lycopersicum) to compare the phenotypic effects of each chromosomal region singly and in combination with each other region. • We detected main effect quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for two of our three focal traits. Epistatic effects accounted for c. 25% of detected effects on trait means, depending on the trait. Strikingly, all but two interactions were antagonistic, with the combined effect of chromosomal regions acting in the opposite direction from that of one or both individual chromosomal regions. • Our study is one of the few to systematically examine pairwise epistatic effects in a nonmicrobial system. Our results suggest that epistatic interactions can contribute substantially to the genetic basis of traits involved in adaptive species differentiation, especially highly complex, multivariate traits. © New Phytologist (2009).

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muir, C. D., & Moyle, L. C. (2009). Antagonistic epistasis for ecophysiological trait differences between Solanum species. New Phytologist, 183(3), 789–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02949.x

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

48%

Researcher 20

37%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48

87%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

9%

Environmental Science 1

2%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0