Does the distribution of health care benefits in Kenya meet the principles of universal coverage?

49Citations
Citations of this article
220Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The 58 th World Health Assembly called for all health systems to move towards universal coverage where everyone has access to key promotive, preventive, curative and rehabilitative health interventions at an affordable cost. Universal coverage involves ensuring that health care benefits are distributed on the basis of need for care and not on ability to pay. The distribution of health care benefits is therefore an important policy question, which health systems should address. The aim of this study is to assess the distribution of health care benefits in the Kenyan health system, compare changes over two time periods and demonstrate the extent to which the distribution meets the principles of universal coverage. Methods. Two nationally representative cross-sectional households surveys conducted in 2003 and 2007 were the main sources of data. A comprehensive analysis of the entire health system is conducted including the public sector, private-not-for-profit and private-for-profit sectors. Standard benefit incidence analysis techniques were applied and adopted to allow application to private sector services. Results: The three sectors recorded similar levels of pro-rich distribution in 2003, but in 2007, the private-not-for-profit sector was pro-poor, public sector benefits showed an equal distribution, while the private-for-profit sector remained pro-rich. Larger pro-rich disparities were recorded for inpatient compared to outpatient benefits at the hospital level, but primary health care services were pro-poor. Benefits were distributed on the basis of ability to pay and not on need for care. Conclusions: The principles of universal coverage require that all should benefit from health care according to need. The Kenyan health sector is clearly inequitable and benefits are not distributed on the basis of need. Deliberate efforts should be directed to restructuring the Kenyan health system to address access barriers and ensure that all Kenyans benefit from health care when they need it. © 2011 Chuma et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Household strategies to cope with the economic costs of illness

225Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The incidence of public spending on healthcare: Comparative evidence from Asia

138Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Seasonal variations of household costs of illness in Burkina Faso

110Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Equity In Health care financing in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review of evidence from studies using benefit and financing incidence analyses

131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cost and affordability of non-communicable disease screening, diagnosis and treatment in Kenya: Patient payments in the private and public sectors

83Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The free vaccination policy of influenza in Beijing, China: The vaccine coverage and its associated factors

80Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chuma, J., Maina, T., & Ataguba, J. (2012). Does the distribution of health care benefits in Kenya meet the principles of universal coverage? BMC Public Health, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-20

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 94

72%

Researcher 26

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

5%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 50

43%

Social Sciences 32

28%

Nursing and Health Professions 17

15%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free