Algorithms for Stochastic Games With Perfect Monitoring

  • Abreu D
  • Brooks B
  • Sannikov Y
6Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We study the pure‐strategy subgame‐perfect Nash equilibria of stochastic games with perfect monitoring, geometric discounting, and public randomization. We develop novel algorithms for computing equilibrium payoffs, in which we combine policy iteration when incentive constraints are slack with value iteration when incentive constraints bind. We also provide software implementations of our algorithms. Preliminary simulations indicate that they are significantly more efficient than existing methods. The theoretical results that underlie the algorithms also imply bounds on the computational complexity of equilibrium payoffs when there are two players. When there are more than two players, we show by example that the number of extreme equilibrium payoffs may be countably infinite.

References Powered by Scopus

Markov-perfect industry dynamics: A framework for empirical work

1070Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Repeated Games and Reputations: Long-Run Relationships

542Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimal cartel equilibria with imperfect monitoring

347Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Algorithms for Stochastic Games With Perfect Monitoring

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Time-Consistency in Dynamic Cooperative Games with Multiple Trajectories

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A partial identification framework for dynamic games

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abreu, D., Brooks, B., & Sannikov, Y. (2020). Algorithms for Stochastic Games With Perfect Monitoring. Econometrica, 88(4), 1661–1695. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta14357

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

73%

Researcher 3

27%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7

70%

Decision Sciences 1

10%

Computer Science 1

10%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free