Effects of midodrine and L-NAME on systemic and cerebral hemodynamics during cognitive activation in spinal cord injury and intact controls

15Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We previously showed that increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) following administration of midodrine hydrochloride (MH) and nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) resulted in increased mean cerebral blood flow velocity (MFV) during head-up tilt in hypotensive individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and question if this same association was evident during cognitive activation. Herein, we report MAP and MFV during two serial subtraction tasks (SSt) given before (predrug) and after (postdrug) administration of MH; (10 mg), L-NAME (1 mg/kg) or no drug (ND) in 15 subjects with SCI compared to nine able-bodied (AB) controls. Three-way factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) models were used to determine significant main and interaction effects for group (SCI, AB), visit (MH, L-NAME, ND), and time (predrug, postdrug) for MAP and MFV during the two SSt. The three-way interaction was significant for MAP (F = 4.262; P = 0.020); both MH (30 ± 26 mmHg; P < 0.05) and L-NAME (27 ± 22 mmHg; P < 0.01) significantly increased MAP in the SCI group, but not in the AB group. There was a significant visit by time interaction for MFV suggesting an increase from predrug to postdrug following L-NAME (6 ± 8 cm/sec; P < 0.05) and MH (4 ± 7 cm/sec; P < 0.05), regardless of study group, with little change following ND (3 ± 3 cm/sec). The relationship between change in MAP and MFV was significant in the SCI group following administration of MH (r2 = 0.38; P < 0.05) and L-NAME (r2 = 0.32; P < 0.05). These antihypotensive agents, at the doses tested, raised MAP, which was associated with an increase MFV during cognitive activation in hypotensive subjects with SCI.

Figures

  • Table 1. Subject characteristics
  • Table 2. Predrug hemodynamics
  • Figure 1. Change from predrug to postdrug following L-NAME (open triangles), MH (closed squares) and ND (open circles) for MAP (top panels), SBP (middle panels), and DBP (bottom panels) in the SCI (A, C, E) and AB (B, D, F) groups.
  • Figure 2. Change from predrug to postdrug following L-NAME (open triangles), MH (closed squares) and ND (open circles) for MFV (top panels), SFV (middle panels), and DFV (bottom panels) in the SCI (A, C, E) and AB (B, D, F) groups.
  • Figure 3. Relationship between change in MAP and change in MFV from predrug to postdrug during the SSt following MH (closed circles) and LN (open squares) in the SCI group. The slope of this relationship was significant for MH (r2 = 0.39; P < 0.01) and LN (r2 = 0.33; P < 0.05).

References Powered by Scopus

Integrative regulation of human brain blood flow

668Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Orthostatic hypotension and autonomic pathways after spinal cord injury

176Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Autonomic neural control of the cerebral vasculature: Acute hypotension

150Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Patterns of cognitive deficits in persons with spinal cord injury as compared with both age-matched and older individuals without spinal cord injury

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implication of altered autonomic control for orthostatic tolerance in SCI

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction in Spinal Cord Injury: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wecht, J. M., Weir, J. P., Radulovic, M., & Bauman, W. A. (2016). Effects of midodrine and L-NAME on systemic and cerebral hemodynamics during cognitive activation in spinal cord injury and intact controls. Physiological Reports, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12683

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

61%

Researcher 5

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 9

33%

Neuroscience 8

30%

Sports and Recreations 6

22%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0