Instrumental variable analysis

22Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The main advantage of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the random assignment of treatment that prevents selection by prognosis. Nevertheless, only few RCTs can be performed given their high cost and the difficulties in conducting such studies. Therefore, several analytical methods for removing the effects of selection bias in observational studies have been proposed. The first aim of this paper is to compare three of those methods: the multivariable risk adjustment method, the propensity score risk adjustment method, and the instrumental variable method. The second aim is to compare the results from observational studies using the instrumental variable method with those from RCTs aiming to answer the same study question. © The Author 2013.

References Powered by Scopus

Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs

2863Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing hemodialysis

2380Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): A randomised placebo-controlled trial

2166Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Use of phosphate-binding agents is associated with a lower risk of mortality

134Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A tutorial on the use of instrumental variables in pharmacoepidemiology

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Merits and caveats of propensity scores to adjust for confounding

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stel, V. S., Dekker, F. W., Zoccali, C., & Jager, K. J. (2013, July). Instrumental variable analysis. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs310

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

51%

Researcher 10

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 28

82%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

6%

Engineering 2

6%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0