Unlock the potential for Saudi Arabian higher education: a systematic review of the benefits of ChatGPT

9Citations
Citations of this article
118Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This systematic review investigates the potential benefits of integrating ChatGPT in higher education. Focusing on ChatGPT’s impact, the study identifies themes such as ChatGPT’s role in teaching and instruction, enhancing student learning and engagement, aiding language learning, and promoting inclusivity. The review underscores ChatGPT’s ability to reshape the educational landscape, improve research and writing, bridge language gaps, and address specific challenges. ChatGPT emerges as a transformative tool empowering educators and students, aligning with Saudi Arabia’s pursuit of academic excellence and future workforce readiness.

References Powered by Scopus

Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review

9756Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education

1957Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

1939Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

ChatGPT’s Integration in GCC Higher Education: Bibliometric Analysis of Trends

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

THE IMPACT OF GENERATIVE AI TOOLS ON POSTGRADUATE STUDENTS’ LEARNING EXPERIENCES: NEW INSIGHTS INTO USAGE PATTERNS

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artificial Intelligence Applications in College Academic Writing and Composition: A Systematic Review

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faisal, E. (2024). Unlock the potential for Saudi Arabian higher education: a systematic review of the benefits of ChatGPT. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1325601

Readers over time

‘24‘250255075100

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

48%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

28%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

24%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 13

57%

Business, Management and Accounting 6

26%

Computer Science 2

9%

Engineering 2

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0