Augmentation of drug reward by chronic food restriction: Behavioral evidence and underlying mechanisms

256Citations
Citations of this article
139Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Chronic food restriction and maintenance of low body weight have long been known to increase the self-administration and motor-activating effects of abused drugs. Using a lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation (LHSS) rate-frequency method, it is shown that chronic food restriction augments the rewarding (i.e., threshold lowering) effect of diverse drugs of abuse. Further, the effect is attributed to increased sensitivity of a neural substrate, rather than a change in drug bioavailability or pharmacokinetics, because it is preserved when drugs are injected directly into the lateral cerebral ventricle (intracerebroventricularly). The food restriction regimen that augments drug reward also increases the induction of c-fos, by intracerebroventricular amphetamine, in limbic forebrain dopamine (DA) terminal areas. The possibility of increased DA receptor function is suggested by findings that rewarding and motor-activating effects of direct DA receptor agonists are augmented by food restriction, and the augmented behavioral effects of amphetamine are reversed by an otherwise subthreshold dose of D-1 antagonist. Initial studies of DA receptor-mediated signal transduction, that are focused on the D-2 receptor, suggest increased functional coupling between receptor and G-protein (i.e., quinpirole-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding) in dorsal striatum. Unlike behavioral sensitization induced by intermittent stress or psychostimulant treatment, which persist indefinitely following induction, the augmenting effect of food restriction abates within 1 week of restored ad libitum feeding and weight gain. The possible involvement of endocrine hormones and/or 'feeding-related' neuropeptides, whose levels change dynamically with depletion and repletion of adipose stores, is therefore under investigation. Initial tests have been limited to acute treatments aimed at attenuating the effects of hypoinsulinemia, hypoleptinemia and elevated corticosterone levels in food-restricted rats. None of these treatments has attenuated the behavioral effect of food restriction. While a melanocortin receptor agonist has been found to enhance drug reward, melanocortin receptors do not seem to mediate the augmenting effect of food restriction. Continuing investigations of endocrine adiposity signals, 'feeding-related' neuropeptides and dopaminergic signal transduction may further elucidate the way in which drugs of abuse exploit mechanisms that mediate survival-related behavior, and help explain the high comorbidity of drug abuse and eating disorders. © 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Stimulus-transcription coupling in the nervous system: Involvement of the inducible proto-oncogenes fos and jun

2554Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dopamine transmission in the initiation and expression of drug- and stress-induced sensitization of motor activity

1847Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Leptin enters the brain by a saturable system independent of insulin

1152Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Dopamine reward circuitry: Two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens-olfactory tubercle complex

1166Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A role for lateral hypothalamic orexin neurons in reward seeking

1133Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ghrelin modulates the activity and synaptic input organization of midbrain dopamine neurons while promoting appetite

826Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carr, K. D. (2002). Augmentation of drug reward by chronic food restriction: Behavioral evidence and underlying mechanisms. In Physiology and Behavior (Vol. 76, pp. 353–364). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00759-X

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 52

53%

Researcher 22

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 21

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36

38%

Neuroscience 25

26%

Psychology 21

22%

Medicine and Dentistry 14

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free