Prior preferences beneficially influence social and non-social learning

22Citations
Citations of this article
141Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Our personal preferences affect a broad array of social behaviors. This includes the way we learn the preferences of others, an ability that often relies on limited or ambiguous information. Here we report an egocentric influence on this type of social learning that is reflected in both performance and response times. Using computational models that combine inter-trial learning and intra-trial choice, we find transient effects of participants' preferences on the learning process, through the influence of priors, and persistent effects on the choice process. A second experiment shows that these effects generalize to non-social learning, though participants in the social learning experiment appeared to additionally benefit by using their knowledge about the popularity of certain preferences. We further find that the domain-general egocentric influences we identify can yield performance advantages in uncertain environments.

References Powered by Scopus

Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4

58521Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory?

4656Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Social influence: Compliance and conformity

3895Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Resolving uncertainty in a social world

153Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The application of computational models to social neuroscience: promises and pitfalls

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mitigating belief projection in explainable artificial intelligence via Bayesian teaching

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tarantola, T., Kumaran, D., Dayan, P., & De Martino, B. (2017). Prior preferences beneficially influence social and non-social learning. Nature Communications, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00826-8

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 71

76%

Researcher 13

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 46

57%

Neuroscience 21

26%

Computer Science 7

9%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
References: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free