The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study

18Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background:Caesarean delivery (CD) rates are commonly used as an indicator of quality in obstetric care and risk adjustment evaluation is recommended to assess inter-institutional variations. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the Ten Group classification system (TGCS) can be used in case-mix adjustment.Methods:Standardized data on 15,255 deliveries from 11 different regional centers were prospectively collected. Crude Risk Ratios of CDs were calculated for each center. Two multiple logistic regression models were herein considered by using: Model 1- maternal (age, Body Mass Index), obstetric variables (gestational age, fetal presentation, single or multiple, previous scar, parity, neonatal birth weight) and presence of risk factors; Model 2- TGCS either with or without maternal characteristics and presence of risk factors. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves of the multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of each model. The null hypothesis that Areas under ROC Curve (AUC) were not different from each other was verified with a Chi Square test and post hoc pairwise comparisons by using a Bonferroni correction.Results:Crude evaluation of CD rates showed all centers had significantly higher Risk Ratios than the referent. Both multiple logistic regression models reduced these variations. However the two methods ranked institutions differently: model 1 and model 2 (adjusted for TGCS) identified respectively nine and eight centers with significantly higher CD rates than the referent with slightly different AUCs (0.8758 and 0.8929 respectively). In the adjusted model for TGCS and maternal characteristics/presence of risk factors, three centers had CD rates similar to the referent with the best AUC (0.9024).Conclusions:The TGCS might be considered as a reliable variable to adjust CD rates. The addition of maternal characteristics and risk factors to TGCS substantially increase the predictive discrimination of the risk adjusted model. © 2013 Maso et al.

Figures

  • Table 1. The 10-group classification.
  • Figure 1. Inter-institutional caesarean delivery rates: data are presented as percentages (number of caesarean deliveries/total number of deliveries. The dot line represents the average of overall caesarean delivery rates. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062364.g001
  • Table 2. Mode of delivery (vaginal vs. caesarean) according to maternal characteristics, obstetric variables and 10-Group classification.
  • Table 2. Cont.
  • Figure 2. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for the multivariate logistic regression models. Footnotes: Model 1: Adjusted for maternal characteristics, pregnancy related variables and risk category. Model 2a: Adjusted for ten-groups. Model 2b: Adjusted for ten-groups, maternal characteristics and risk category. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062364.g002
  • Table 3. Inter-institutional crude and adjusted Risk Ratios (RR, 95% Confidence Interval) for caesarean risk-adjustment models.
  • Table 4. Assessment of the fit of risk-adjustment models.

References Powered by Scopus

What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes

3397Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rates of caesarean section: Analysis of global, regional and national estimates

749Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women who are overweight or obese

315Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The role of gestational diabetes, pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on the risk of newborn macrosomia: Results from a prospective multicentre study

180Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A global reference for caesarean section rates (C-Model): A multicountry cross-sectional study

91Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Can body mass index accurately predict adiposity in newborns?

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maso, G., Alberico, S., Monasta, L., Ronfani, L., Montico, M., Businelli, C., … Tamburlini, G. (2013). The Application of the Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) in Caesarean Delivery Case Mix Adjustment. A Multicenter Prospective Study. PLoS ONE, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062364

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2405101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

59%

Researcher 8

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 21

62%

Nursing and Health Professions 7

21%

Social Sciences 3

9%

Psychology 3

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0