"Implicit" and "explicit" CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility

3.1kCitations
Citations of this article
3.9kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We address the question of how and why corporate social responsibility (CSR) differs among countries and how and why it changes. Applying two schools of thought in institutional theory, we conceptualize, first, the differences between CSR in the United States and Europe and, second, the recent rise of CSR in Europe. We also delineate the potential of our framework for application to other parts of the global economy. Copyright of the Academy of Management, all rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders

4831Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct

3875Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory

2353Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Stakeholder theory: The state of the art

2337Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution?

1277Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What drives corporate social performance the role of nation-level institutions

991Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250150300450600

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1789

74%

Professor / Associate Prof. 225

9%

Researcher 200

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 195

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 1696

69%

Social Sciences 403

16%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 283

12%

Environmental Science 74

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 4
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 71

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0