Healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration

6Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Geographic atrophy (GA) is an advanced form of nonexudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) that lacks treatment options. With considerable interpatient variability in the rate of GA progression due to lesion characteristics, information characterizing the disease burden is limited. The aim of this study was to describe the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with increasing severity levels of GA. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using claims data from IQVIA’s PharMetrics Plus database. Patients with a prevalent GA diagnosis were identified between October 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017 and classified by disease severity and laterality. Disease-specific HCRU and costs by disease severity were assessed during the 12-month follow-up period, with multivariable analyses performed adjusting for baseline characteristics. Results: A total of 28,773 GA cases were identified (mean age = 68.7; 58.5% female), of which 24% and 76% had unilateral and bilateral GA, respectively, with varying levels of recorded severity (in increasing order): early or intermediate (EI) AMD, GA without sub-foveal involvement (GAwoSF), and GA with subfoveal involvement (GAwSF). Patients with greater baseline severity in the bilateral group had a significantly higher number of outpatient (OP) visits per year (1.98 EI AMD; 2.57 for GAwoSF; 2.63 for GAwSF). Increasing disease severity was associated with higher patient-related costs in the outpatient setting (mean [SD] of $82 [$157], $110 [$559] for unilateral EI AMD and GAwSF, respectively, and $56 [$94], $64 [$97], $59 [$85] for bilateral EI AMD, GAwoSF, GAwSF, respectively). Similarly, higher payer-related costs were seen in patients with bilateral GAwSF compared to bilateral EI AMD (mean [SD] $280 [$325]; $198 [$262]). Conclusion: Study findings demonstrate that patients, with more severe GA at baseline, experience greater HCRU and costs in the outpatient setting. Further research should explore specific contributing factors to the long-term economic burden of GA.

References Powered by Scopus

Estimating log models: To transform or not to transform?

1742Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Review of statistical methods for analysing healthcare resources and costs

556Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Progression of Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration

389Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Economic Burden of Late-Stage Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Bulgaria, Germany, and the US

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EXPANDING THE UNDERSTANDING OF GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHY

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilization, Healthcare Costs, and Injurious Falls Among Elderly Patients with Geographic Atrophy

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, A., Devine, B., Campbell, J., Shirneshan, E., Zhao, C., & Bansal, A. (2021). Healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Clinical Ophthalmology, 15, 2643–2651. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S307603

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Researcher 3

43%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

43%

Neuroscience 2

29%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Mathematics 1

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0