Moth hearing and sound communication

32Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Active echolocation enables bats to orient and hunt the night sky for insects. As a counter-measure against the severe predation pressure many nocturnal insects have evolved ears sensitive to ultrasonic bat calls. In moths bat-detection was the principal purpose of hearing, as evidenced by comparable hearing physiology with best sensitivity in the bat echolocation range, 20–60 kHz, across moths in spite of diverse ear morphology. Some eared moths subsequently developed sound-producing organs to warn/startle/jam attacking bats and/or to communicate intraspecifically with sound. Not only the sounds for interaction with bats, but also mating signals are within the frequency range where bats echolocate, indicating that sound communication developed after hearing by “sensory exploitation”. Recent findings on moth sound communication reveal that close-range (~ a few cm) communication with low-intensity ultrasounds “whispered” by males during courtship is not uncommon, contrary to the general notion of moths predominantly being silent. Sexual sound communication in moths may apply to many eared moths, perhaps even a majority. The low intensities and high frequencies explain that this was overlooked, revealing a bias towards what humans can sense, when studying (acoustic) communication in animals.

References Powered by Scopus

Echolocation by insect-eating bats

849Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids

697Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection

676Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

It's Not a Bug, It's a Feature: Functional Materials in Insects

154Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evolutionary escalation: The bat-moth arms race

86Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hearing in Insects

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nakano, R., Takanashi, T., & Surlykke, A. (2015, January 1). Moth hearing and sound communication. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology. Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-014-0945-8

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 38

67%

Researcher 13

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52

80%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

8%

Neuroscience 4

6%

Environmental Science 4

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free