Challenges in implementing the 2015 BASHH guidelines for the appropriate use of post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV following sexual exposure.

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The use of post exposure prophylaxis for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) following sexual exposure (PEPSE) was retrospectively audited in an inner city genitourinary clinic against the 2015 national guidelines by the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH). One-hundred out of a total of 101 patients (99%) had a baseline HIV test done. 82.1% (n=83) of patients were given PEPSE prescriptions fitting within recommended indications lower than the 90% target set by BASHH. 84.2% (n=85) of patients had PEPSE administered within 72 hours lower than the 90%. 61.4% (n=62) of patients were known to have completed four weeks of PEPSE lower than the 75% target. 61.4% (n=62) of patients were screened for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) lower than the 90% target. 59.4% (n=60%) of patients had post-PEPSE HIV bloods slightly lower than the 60% target.

References Powered by Scopus

Immune response to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in healthcare workers occupationally exposed to HIV-contaminated blood

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of a short-term HAART on SIV load in macaque tissues is dependent on time of initiation and antiviral diffusion

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Concordance of emergency department physicians’ decisions on HIV post-exposure prophylaxis with national guidelines: results from a retrospective cohort study

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khattak, M. F. (2016). Challenges in implementing the 2015 BASHH guidelines for the appropriate use of post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV following sexual exposure. F1000Research, 5. https://doi.org/10.12688/F1000RESEARCH.8952.1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

60%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

40%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

20%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

20%

Materials Science 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free