Models for estimating the potential number of ship collisions

13Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper analyses two different methods of estimating ship collision candidates. The first one is an analytical approach; accordingly, an overview of various analytical expressions for estimating the number of collision candidates for three main situations (encounter, overtaking, and crossing) will be presented. The second is a simulation approach: the paper will present how to simulate ship movements by replacing them with circles in order to obtain a graphical presentation of ship movements in the zone of danger, including the calculation of collision candidates. The applied simulation model will also feature three main situations, i.e. encounter, overtaking, and crossing, and the results of simulations will be compared with the results of analytical models. The results and conclusions should improve the existing models for obtaining the potential number of ship collisions and encourage new advanced simulation methods.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

GRACAT: Software for grounding and collision risk analysis

78Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

II—The Probability of Stranding

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On Safety Metrics related to Aircraft Separation

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Probabilistic risk analysis for ship-ship collision: State-of-the-art

203Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ship collision candidate detection method: A velocity obstacle approach

153Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ship collision avoidance behaviour recognition and analysis based on AIS data

80Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lušić, Z., & Čorić, M. (2015). Models for estimating the potential number of ship collisions. Journal of Navigation, 68(4), 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463314000903

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘20‘21‘22‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

64%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

18%

Researcher 2

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 8

73%

Decision Sciences 1

9%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

9%

Computer Science 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0