Is travel actually risky? A study of situational causes of victimization

12Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: We present a first test using a smartphone time use survey app for whether the risk of criminal victimization is higher while traveling than during other activities, and assess risk heterogeneity between public transport, private transport by car, and private open-air transport. Methods: A sample of 1334 young adults completed a time-use survey on their smartphones with additional items on criminal victimization. Participants reported their time use and victimization experiences (vandalism, theft, threat, or assault) per 10-min timeslot for 4 days. To prevent potential confounders from affecting the results, we analyzed the data with a fixed effects logit model that exclusively relies on within-person variation between timeslots. Findings: A total of 78 victimization situations were reported by 45 participants. Although these numbers are too low to draw definitive conclusions, with respect to the four types of victimization measured, sleeping appeared to be the safest activity. The risk of victimization was considerably larger during travel, but also during many other activities. We found shopping to be the activity with the highest risk of victimization. No victimization was observed during private transport by car, but the risk of victimization was significantly higher in private open-air and public transport than during sleep. Conclusion: Using a state-of-the-art instrument and a rigorous statistical design, we tentatively conclude that the risk of criminal victimization is not higher during travel than during most other activities, only sleeping is safer. Larger samples are needed to assess the robustness of our findings. We discuss practical implications, strengths and weaknesses of the study, and new research challenges.

References Powered by Scopus

Deriving and validating trip purposes and travel modes for multi-day GPS-based travel surveys: A large-scale application in the Netherlands

400Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Robberies in Chicago: A block-level analysis of the influence of crime generators, crime attractors, and offender anchor points

382Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guardians on guardianship: Factors affecting the willingness to supervise, the ability to detect potential offenders, and the willingness to intervene

201Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Crime Feeds on Legal Activities: Daily Mobility Flows Help to Explain Thieves’ Target Location Choices

68Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

As Violence Unfolds: A Space–Time Study of Situational Triggers of Violent Victimization Among Urban Youth

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Right place, right time? Making crime pattern theory time-specific

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ruiter, S., & Bernasco, W. (2018). Is travel actually risky? A study of situational causes of victimization. Crime Science, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-018-0084-6

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

74%

Researcher 4

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 11

61%

Psychology 4

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

11%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free