On bigness and the problem of urban form

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The term ‘bigness’ refers to large-scale, mixed-use buildings and was introduced into the architectural vocabulary by Rem Koolhaas. Contrary to Koolhaas’s focus on the ‘generic city‘ and the Asian context, this essay explores the role that large-scale buildings may play in establishing a dialogue between new areas of urban expansion and the formal and typological characteristics of European cities. By looking at three designs by Jacques Herzog and Pierre de Meuron in the light of the early twentieth-century debate on urban design and the skyscraper in Europe, the problem of bigness will be seen as a continuation of a discussion on urban form and type spanning more than one hundred years. Bigness will thus be seen as a tool capable of reworking and even continuing existing urban formal types, even if devoid of ideological and symbolic meaning.

References Powered by Scopus

The Interpretation of the Glass Dream — Expressionist Architecture and the History of the Crystal Metaphor

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Paul Scheerbart's Architectural Fantasies

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Drawing the region: Hermann Jansen's vision of Greater Berlin in 1910

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rabaça, A., & Martins, C. M. (2018). On bigness and the problem of urban form. Footprint, 2018(22), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.59490/footprint.12.1.1776

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

83%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 3

43%

Design 2

29%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Engineering 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free