Strategies for silencing human disease using RNA interference

985Citations
Citations of this article
838Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Since the first description of RNA interference (RNAi) in animals less than a decade ago, there has been rapid progress towards its use as a therapeutic modality against human diseases. Advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of RNAi and studies of RNAi in vivo indicate that RNAi-based therapies might soon provide a powerful new arsenal against pathogens and diseases for which treatment options are currently limited. Recent findings have highlighted both promise and challenges in using RNAi for therapeutic applications. Design and delivery strategies for RNAi effector molecules must be carefully considered to address safety concerns and to ensure effective, successful treatment of human diseases. © 2007 Nature Publishing Group.

References Powered by Scopus

Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in caenorhabditis elegans

12810Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14

10847Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets

10420Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Advanced targeted therapies in cancer: Drug nanocarriers, the future of chemotherapy

1487Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

MicroRNAs and other non-coding RNAs as targets for anticancer drug development

1276Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interfering with disease: A progress report on siRNA-based therapeutics

1116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, D. H., & Rossi, J. J. (2007, March). Strategies for silencing human disease using RNA interference. Nature Reviews Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2006

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 372

63%

Researcher 143

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 61

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 16

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 312

54%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 141

25%

Medicine and Dentistry 68

12%

Chemistry 54

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free