Influence of maternal body mass index on accuracy and reliability of external fetal monitoring techniques

68Citations
Citations of this article
115Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the performance of external electronic fetal heart rate and uterine contraction monitoring according to maternal body mass index. Design Secondary analysis of prospective equivalence study. Setting Three US urban teaching hospitals. Sample Seventy-four parturients with a normal term pregnancy. Methods The parent study assessed performance of two methods of external fetal heart rate monitoring (abdominal fetal electrocardiogram and Doppler ultrasound) and of uterine contraction monitoring (electrohystero-graphy and tocodynamometry) compared with internal monitoring with fetal scalp electrode and intrauterine pressure transducer. Reliability of external techniques was assessed by the success rate and positive percent agreement with internal methods. Bland-Altman analysis determined accuracy. We analyzed data from that study according to maternal body mass index. Main outcome measures We assessed the relationship between body mass index and monitor performance with linear regression, using body mass index as the independent variable and measures of reliability and accuracy as dependent variables. Results There was no significant association between maternal body mass index and any measure of reliability or accuracy for abdominal fetal electrocardiogram. By contrast, the overall positive percent agreement for Doppler ultrasound declined (p = 0.042), and the root mean square error from the Bland-Altman analysis increased in the first stage (p = 0.029) with increasing body mass index. Uterine contraction recordings from electrohysterography and tocodynamometry showed no significant deterioration related to maternal body mass index. Conclusions Accuracy and reliability of fetal heart rate monitoring using abdominal fetal electrocardiogram was unaffected by maternal obesity, whereas performance of ultrasound degraded directly with maternal size. Both electrohysterography and tocodynamometry were unperturbed by obesity. © 2014 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

References Powered by Scopus

STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT

42165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A nationally representative study of maternal obesity in England, UK: Trends in incidence and demographic inequalities in 619 323 births, 1989-2007

349Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Is obesity still increasing among pregnant women? Prepregnancy obesity trends in 20 states, 2003-2009

224Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A Review of Signal Processing Techniques for Non-Invasive Fetal Electrocardiography

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Non-invasive fetal monitoring: A maternal surface ECG electrode placement-based novel approach for optimization of adaptive filter control parameters using the LMS and RLS algorithms

89Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Non-adaptive methods for fetal ECG signal processing: A review and appraisal

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cohen, W. R., & Hayes-Gill, B. (2014). Influence of maternal body mass index on accuracy and reliability of external fetal monitoring techniques. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 93(6), 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12387

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 41

67%

Researcher 9

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 41

63%

Engineering 13

20%

Nursing and Health Professions 8

12%

Neuroscience 3

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0