Comparing Metal-Halide and -Oxygen Adducts in Oxidative C/O-H Activation: AuIII-Cl versus AuIII-OH

12Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

High-valent metal-halides have come to prominence as highly effective oxidants. A direct comparison of their efficacy against that of traditional metal-oxygen adducts is needed. [AuIII(Cl)(terpy)](ClO4)2 (1; terpy = 2,2′:6′,2-terpyridine) readily oxidized substrates bearing O-H and C-H bonds via a hydrogen atom transfer mechanism. A direct comparison with [AuIII(OH)(terpy)](ClO4)2 (2) showed that 1 was a kinetically superior oxidant with respect to 2 for all substrates tested. We ascribe this to the greater thermodynamic driving force imbued by the Cl ligand versus the OH ligand.

References Powered by Scopus

Selective Intermolecular Carbon-Hydrogen Bond Activation by Synthetic Metal Complexes in Homogeneous Solution

1401Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Thermochemistry of proton-coupled electron transfer reagents and its implications

1362Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Three methods to measure RH bond energies

1076Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evidence for a High-Valent Iron-Fluoride That Mediates Oxidative C(sp<sup>3</sup>)-H Fluorination

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Oxidative versus basic asynchronous hydrogen atom transfer reactions of Mn(iii)-hydroxo and Mn(iii)-aqua complexes

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nonheme Iron(III) Azide and Iron(III) Isothiocyanate Complexes: Radical Rebound Reactivity, Selectivity, and Catalysis

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lovisari, M., Gericke, R., Twamley, B., & McDonald, A. R. (2021). Comparing Metal-Halide and -Oxygen Adducts in Oxidative C/O-H Activation: AuIII-Cl versus AuIII-OH. Inorganic Chemistry, 60(20), 15610–15616. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c02222

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Researcher 2

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemistry 5

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0