Machinery Faults Prediction Using Ensemble Tree Classifiers: Bagging or Boosting?

  • Bakkhtiari Ramezani S
  • Amirlatifi A
  • Kirby T
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

One of the main goals of predictive maintenance is to accurately classify the temporal trends as early as possible, detect faulty states and pinpoint the root cause of the fault. Undoubtedly, neither late nor early maintenance is desirable and incurs additional operating costs; however, early identification of faulty trends and scheduling on-time maintenance is crucial to smooth machinery operation. Various data-driven techniques have been used to identify faults; nevertheless, many of these techniques fail to perform when faced with missing values at run time or lack any explanation on the root cause of the fault. The present work offers a comprehensive study on different techniques used for fault type classification and compares their performance in identifying the mode of operation for the PHME21 dataset. We also evaluate the robustness of such classifiers against missing values. This study shows that tree-based techniques are best suited to perform root cause analysis for each faulty state and establish rules for faulty conditions.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bakkhtiari Ramezani, S., Amirlatifi, A., Kirby, T., Rahimi, S., & Seale, M. (2021). Machinery Faults Prediction Using Ensemble Tree Classifiers: Bagging or Boosting? Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2021.v13i1.3063

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘2301234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

80%

Computer Science 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0