Validation of serum IGF-I as a biomarker to monitor the bioactivity of exogenous growth hormone agonists and antagonists in rabbits

19Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The development of new growth hormone (GH) agonists and growth hormone antagonists (GHAs) requires animal models for pre-clinical testing. Ideally, the effects of treatment are monitored using the same pharmacodynamic marker that is later used in clinical practice. However, intact rodents are of limited value for this purpose because serum IGF-I, the most sensitive pharmacodynamic marker for the action of GH in humans, shows no response to treatment with recombinant human GH and there is little evidence for the effects of GHAs, except when administered at very high doses or when overexpressed. As an alternative, more suitable model, we explored pharmacodynamic markers of GH action in intact rabbits. We performed the first validation of an IGF-I assay for the analysis of rabbit serum and tested precision, sensitivity, linearity and recovery using an automated human IGF-I assay (IDS-iSYS). Furthermore, IGF-I was measured in rabbits of different strains, age groups and sexes, and we monitored IGF-I response to treatment with recombinant human GH or the GHA Pegvisomant. For a subset of samples, we used LC-MS/MS to measure IGF-I, and quantitative western ligand blot to analyze IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs). Although recovery of recombinant rabbit IGF-I was only 50% in the human IGF-I assay, our results show that the sensitivity, precision (1.7-3.3% coefficient of variation) and linearity (90.4-105.6%) were excellent in rabbit samples. As expected, sex, age and genetic background were major determinants of IGF-I concentration in rabbits. IGF-I and IGFBP-2 levels increased after single and multiple injections of recombinant human GH (IGF-I: 286±22 versus 434±26 ng/ml; P<0.01) and were highly correlated (P<0.0001). Treatment with the GHA lowered IGF-I levels from the fourth injection onwards (P<0.01). In summary, we demonstrated that the IDS-iSYS IGF-I immunoassay can be used in rabbits. Similar to rodents, rabbits display variations in IGF-I depending on sex, age and genetic background. Unlike in rodents, the IGF-I response to treatment with recombinant human GH or a GHA closely mimics the pharmacodynamics seen in humans, suggesting that rabbits are a suitable new model to test human GH agonists and antagonists.

References Powered by Scopus

Analysis of serum insulin-like growth factor binding proteins using Western blotting: Use of the method for titration of the binding proteins and competitive binding studies

1231Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The somatomedin hypothesis: 2001

1112Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of growth hormone on glucose, lipid, and protein metabolism in human subjects

816Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Long-Acting C-Terminal Peptide-Modified hGH (MOD-4023): Results of a safety and dose-finding study in Ghd children

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Growth hormone binding protein - Physiological and analytical aspects

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Serum and seminal plasma IGF-1 associations with semen variables and effect of IGF-1 supplementation on semen freezing capacity in buffalo bulls

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bielohuby, M., Zarkesh-Esfahani, S. H., Manolopoulou, J., Wirthgen, E., Walpurgis, K., Khorasgani, M. T., … Bidlingmaier, M. (2014). Validation of serum IGF-I as a biomarker to monitor the bioactivity of exogenous growth hormone agonists and antagonists in rabbits. DMM Disease Models and Mechanisms, 7(11), 1263–1273. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.016519

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

60%

Researcher 9

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8

38%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

29%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 4

19%

Engineering 3

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 18

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0