Community participation of community dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study

27Citations
Citations of this article
145Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: With the advancing age of the population, and increasing demands on healthcare services, community participation has become an important consideration for healthy ageing. Low levels of community participation have been linked to increased mortality and social isolation. The extent to which community participation has been measured objectively in older adults remains scarce. This study aims to describe where and how older adults participate in the community and determine the feasibility of measurement methods for community participation. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study obtained data from 46 community dwelling older adults. A combination of Global Positioning Systems (GPS), accelerometry, and self-reported diaries were used over a 7-day monitoring period. Feasibility of methods were determined by calculating the loss of GPS data, questionnaires, and comparison of self-reported locations with GPS co-ordinates. Relationships between community participation, physical activity, social interactions, health related quality of life, sleep quality and loneliness were explored. Results: Older adults took a median (IQR) of 15 (9.25–18.75) trips out of home over the 7-day monitoring period, most frequently visiting commercial and recreational locations. In-home activities were mainly sedentary in nature, with out of home activities dependent on location type. Self-reported and GPS measures of trips out of home and the locations visited were significantly correlated (self-report 15.7 (5.6) GPS 14.4 (5.8) (r = 0.94)). Significant correlations between both the number of trips taken from home, with social interactions (r = 0.62) and the minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (r = 0.43) were observed. Daily MVPA was higher in participants who visited local walk/greenspaces (r = 0.48). Conclusion: Participants performed more activities with social interactions out of home and visited commercial locations most frequently. The combination of GPS, accelerometry and self-report methods provided a detailed picture of community participation for older adults. Further research is required with older adults of varying health status to generalise the relationships between community participation, location and physical activity. Trial registration: Ethical approval was gained from the Flinders University Social and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee (protocol no. 8176).

References Powered by Scopus

The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research

24996Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The physical activity guidelines for Americans

4086Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004

2076Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Older adults’ community participation, physical activity, and social interactions during and following COVID-19 restrictions in Australia: a mixed methods approach

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of the CarFreeMe Traumatic Injuries, a Community Mobility Group Intervention, to Increase Community Participation for People With Traumatic Injuries: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Crossover

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Systematic review of best practices for GPS data usage, processing, and linkage in health, exposure science and environmental context research

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gough, C., Lewis, L. K., Barr, C., Maeder, A., & George, S. (2021). Community participation of community dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10592-4

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

65%

Lecturer / Post doc 9

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

9%

Researcher 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 24

56%

Medicine and Dentistry 8

19%

Social Sciences 7

16%

Sports and Recreations 4

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free