The survival of dental implants with different implant-abutment connection systems

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the survival of implants with different implantabutment connection systems, in patients who had two kinds of implants implanted. In total, 240 implants were implanted - 91 implants with conical abutment Morse connection, and 149 with an internal hexagonal connection. During the follow-up period of 3 years and 10 months, the percentage of lost implants with a conical implant-abutment connection was 1.1%. Regarding the implants with hexagonal implant-abutment connection, this figure was 0.7%. Our work shows that there is a need for further research on the survival of dental implants. In this, the influence of other factors should be explored that are related both to the specific implant treatment, as well as to socio-demographic factors.

References Powered by Scopus

Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter.

196Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Smoking and complications of endosseous dental implants

97Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A retrospective evaluation of 1,387 single-tooth implants: A 6-year follow-up

71Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The relationship between marginal bone loss around dental implants and the specific characteristics of implant-prosthetic treatment

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Marginal bone behavior around the dental implants with regard to the patient's characteristics

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Influence of Selected Titanium Alloy Micro-Texture Parameters on Bacterial Adhesion

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Szpak, P., & Szymanska, J. (2016). The survival of dental implants with different implant-abutment connection systems. Current Issues in Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, 29(1), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/cipms-2016-0003

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

83%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free