A digital twin for root cause analysis and product quality monitoring

24Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Mass customization and increasing product complexity require new methods to ensure a continuously high product quality. In the case of product failures it has to be determined what distinguishes flawed products. The data generated by cybertronic products over their lifecycle offers new possibilities to find such distinctions. To manage this data for individual product instances the concept of a Digital Twin has been proposed. This paper introduces the elements of a Digital Twin for root cause analysis and product quality monitoring and suggests a data structure that enables data analytics.

References Powered by Scopus

MapReduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters

11950Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems

3680Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems

2238Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review

1517Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A review of digital twin in product design and development

240Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A quality-oriented digital twin modelling method for manufacturing processes based on a multi-agent architecture

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Detzner, A., & Eigner, M. (2018). A digital twin for root cause analysis and product quality monitoring. In Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN (Vol. 4, pp. 1547–1558). Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0418

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 45

80%

Researcher 7

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

4%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 34

65%

Computer Science 9

17%

Business, Management and Accounting 6

12%

Design 3

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free