The usefulness of five D-dimer assays in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis

52Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

D-Dimer measurement is a promising tool in the exclusion of venous thrombosis. New D-dimer assays have been introduced, but need clinical validation. Our objective was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of four relatively new D-dimer assays and a classical ELISA in outpatients suspected for deep venous thrombosis. In 537 patients, participants in a large prospective management study using a clinical probability score and a D-dimer measurement (Tina-quant®), additional samples were taken for D-dimer measurement using the Asserachrom ELISA®, the VIDAS New®, the STA-LIA® and the Miniquant® assay. Performances of each test were calculated using clinical data during a 3-month follow-up. Thrombosis was detected in 224 patients (42%). The area under the ROC curve was significantly higher for the Tina-quant as compared to the other assays. Using standard cut-off values, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) and specificity of the Asserachrom were 97, 94 and 33%, respectively. For the VIDAS New, values were 100, 96 and 8%, respectively. The Tina-quant showed values of 99, 98 and 41%, respectively, and the STA-LIA 98, 95 and 32%. Values for the Miniquant were 95, 94 and 52%. The D-dimer assays in our study all show a high sensitivity and negative predictive value, but none of the assays reached an NPV of > 98% at standard cut-off values. D-Dimer assays with a low specificity still necessitate additional diagnostic tests in the majority of the patients. © 2003 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases

6333Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: Increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer

1447Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: Management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and D-dimer

1239Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating D-Dimers in patients with acute aortic dissection

143Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

D-dimer concentration increases with age reducing the clinical value of the D-dimer assay in the elderly

139Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Wells rule does not adequately rule out deep venous thrombosis in primary care patients

132Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schutgens, R. E. G., Haas, F. J. L. M., Gerritsen, W. B. M., Van Der Horst, F., Nieuwenhuis, H. K., & Biesma, D. H. (2003). The usefulness of five D-dimer assays in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 1(5), 976–981. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00148.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

22%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 14

82%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

6%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

6%

Environmental Science 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free